Home > Hard Drive > Seagate Has Highest Failure Rate? It Looks Like It.
Seagate Has Highest Failure Rate? It Looks Like It.
Snowblind Meh. I am very interested to see average age, especially age of failed drives. :P Andy Klein We've included average age in the charts of some of the prior posts: you can Laptop & server class drives have different firmware and components and are totally different devices. Thank you. Check This Out
Needless to say, dell provided seagate drives. and for storaging, c: drive, streaming to my others pc,tv, tablet. Damon I currently have 24 mechanical drives spinning in my house (between 2 servers) and have had probably 50-60 more in the last 5-7 years and have only had 2 failures. This would be a much more environmentally friendly approach, and reduces wear and tear. https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-reliability-stats-q1-2016/
Hard Drive Failure Rates By Brand
I had 5 of those once, and they ALL died. But given the grey market for parts facilitated by places like Ebay, I assume it's passing common. BackBlaze’s hard drive report shows lowest number of drive failures in a quarter ever for the cloud storage company BackBlaze’s numbers aren’t quite straightforward, though. they are unreliable jwusmc03 I was the recent owner of a tech repair and resell company dealing with mostly desktop and laptop computers.
Hopefully bad numbers like this will force them to improve their products. Maybe time to consider getting an external backup drive. Dare I say, unreliable. Most Reliable Hard Drive Brand This “time-in-service” currently outweighs the sheer quantity of Seagate 4 TB drives we have purchased and placed into service the last year or so.
DrMuggg yeah, tough guys don't need to do backups…. …we just cry when nobody can see us… Milk Manson And what if I turn my servers off at night, should I Hgst Hard Drive Damon pray tell, how does monitoring 12,000+ drives over a several year period and logging install and failure date equates to "junk science"? Ronaldinho Bom Caráter Analysing carefully the data, it seems the best cost x benefit is HGST's HMS5C4040BLE640, correct? https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/175089-who-makes-the-most-reliable-hard-drives When I'd use a USB3 cable instead of USB2 cable (USB3 drives but the old microUSB 2 connectors fit) it stopped, so I figured it was a power issue, and on
It's very useful for consumers to see these raw numbers. Hgst Hdd I'm not saying that your friends are wrong, or that you should buy Seagate drives -- but it takes better data than what BB presents to really draw the kinds of Email [email protected] // Twitter @drpizza reader comments 134 Share this story You must login or create an account to comment. ← Previous story Next story → Related Stories Sponsored Stories Powered https://f001.backblaze.com/file/Backblaze_Blog/hard-drive-stats/computing_failure_rates+copy.pdf Stefan Sonnenberg-carstens No, it just shows how the dimensions time, number of drives and number of failures are merged in a misterious way.
Hgst Hard Drive
If you take a normal consumer board, what other option is there? http://www.pcworld.com/article/3071180/storage/who-makes-the-most-reliable-hard-drive-latest-backblaze-survey-claims-to-know.html Most of our distributors work directly with the manufacturers, so we hope that if what you're saying does happen, that it's rare. Hard Drive Failure Rates By Brand However the units I personally bought new still work fine even after 7 years. Most Reliable External Hard Drive 2016 but it is possible that these are more marginal drives with a bit cheaper components.
One Billion Drive Hours and Counting: Q1 2016 Hard Drive Stats May 17th, 2016 For Q1 2016 we are reporting on 61,590 operational hard drives used to store encrypted customer data his comment is here Itechstorm What a great service you guys provide to the community! The drives also run on a 24/7 duty cycle, which hard drive makers have said is outside the design of a consumer hard drive. I always have them on a small shelf away from window to keep them away from the heat. Hgst External Hard Drive
Higher capacity drives aren't failing at statistically different rates than older, smaller drives, implying that buyers don't need to worry that bigger drives are more prone to failure.The usual grain of The Batman Completely unrealistic scenarios for desktop-grade drives. The end result being more wear and tear on the drive than it was designed for.Then there’s cost. this contact form I think they should have to recall all Hard Drives on the market and test them all.
Over 1,691 drives, about 110 failed. Hds5c3030ala630 How do you know the 2tb failure rate? What a few years and an acquisition makes IBM to Hitachi.
nalvarez Do you run your disks 24/7 or do you spin them down occasionally?
Pls express your concerns or forward your inquiry directly to Toshiba: [email protected] Elmer Gloo This is very helpful information. Photo Credit: Adnan Ghosheh via Flickr Tags: backup, Hard disk drive, Hardware, Recovery ▾ Comments Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. The drives least likely to fail were made by HGST, a hard drive company owned by Western Digital that isn’t targeted at a consumer market. Seagate St6000dx000 That's a 0% failure rate in all Seagate drives. ^ You see how stupid that conclusion is?
I might keep them on all the time, or I might have them off most of the time. HGST's drives also fail at a decreasing rate year over year, with a rate just over one percent. I can state the following; Hitatchi's are the golden standard, but carry a price premium and use a bit more electricity in high density (90 drives/4u) than their competitors with the navigate here The company says: "nearly all of the 16,000+ drives purchased in 2015 have been Seagate drives." Of those, "over 85 percent were 4TB Seagate drives."Previously, some Seagate hard drives exhibited high
This time around, though, Seagate dropped its failure rate to 3.48 percent on a total 36,863 drives. After shining a general light on how long hard drives actually last late last year, the company took to its blog on Tuesday to provide a detailed look at how consumer-grade It highlights a manufacturers weakness in some area's, and strengths in others. PC or Mac.
WD's on the other hand have rarely ever failed for me. Braun While I think you have a large enough population of HGST and Seagate drives (tens of thousands) to draw some valid conclusions regarding reliability, I'm a bit concerned that you so it is fine. Hard drives from Toshiba and Western Digital are also represented, but one weakness of the data is the much smaller sample size.
Fortunately, the mirror drive was fine, so I ditched the dead drive and rebuilt the array with another HGST. I've also opened an HP laptop purchased directly from their website and found a drive marked "Refurbished" on a newly purchased system.